Chromosome 10q24.32 Variants Associate With Brain Arterial Diameters in Diverse Populations: A Genome-Wide Association Study.

BACKGROUND: Brain arterial diameters (BADs) are novel imaging biomarkers of cerebrovascular disease, cognitive decline, and dementia. Traditional vascular risk factors have been associated with BADs, but whether there may be genetic determinants of BADs is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: The authors studied 4150 participants from 6 geographically diverse population-based cohorts (40% European, 14% African, 22% Hispanic, 24% Asian ancestries). Brain arterial diameters for 13 segments were measured and averaged to obtain a global measure of BADs as well as the posterior and anterior circulations. A genome-wide association study revealed 14 variants at one locus associated with global BAD at genome-wide significance (P<5×10-8) (top single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs7921574; ß=0.06 [P=1.54×10-8]). This locus mapped to an intron of CNNM2. A trans-ancestry genome-wide association study meta-analysis identified 2 more loci at NT5C2 (rs10748839; P=2.54×10-8) and AS3MT (rs10786721; P=4.97×10-8), associated with global BAD. In addition, 2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms colocalized with expression of CNNM2 (rs7897654; ß=0.12 [P=6.17×10-7]) and AL356608.1 (rs10786719; ß=-0.17 [P=6.60×10-6]) in brain tissue. For the posterior BAD, 2 variants at one locus mapped to an intron of TCF25 were identified (top single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs35994878; ß=0.11 [P=2.94×10-8]). For the anterior BAD, one locus at ADAP1 was identified in trans-ancestry genome-wide association analysis (rs34217249; P=3.11×10-8). CONCLUSIONS: The current study reveals 3 novel risk loci (CNNM2, NT5C2, and AS3MT) associated with BADs. These findings may help elucidate the mechanism by which BADs may influence cerebrovascular health.

Association of brain arterial diameters with demographic and anatomical factors in a multi-national pooled analysis of cohort studies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain arterial diameters are markers of cerebrovascular disease. Demographic and anatomical factors may influence arterial diameters. We hypothesize that age, sex, height, total cranial volume (TCV), and persistent fetal posterior cerebral artery (fPCA) correlate with brain arterial diameters across populations. METHODS: Participants had a time-of-flight MRA from nine international cohorts. Arterial diameters of the cavernous internal carotid arteries (ICA), middle cerebral arteries (MCA), and basilar artery (BA) were measured using LAVA software. Regression models assessed the association between exposures and brain arterial diameters. RESULTS: We included 6,518 participants (mean age: 70 ± 9 years; 41% men). Unilateral fPCA was present in 13.2% and bilateral in 3.2%. Larger ICA, MCA, and BA diameters correlated with older age (Weighted average [WA] per 10 years: 0.18 mm, 0.11 mm, and 0.12 mm), male sex (WA: 0.24 mm, 0.13 mm, and 0.21 mm), and TCV (WA: for one TCV standard deviation: 0.24 mm, 0.29 mm, and 0.18 mm). Unilateral and bilateral fPCAs showed a positive correlation with ICA diameters (WA: 0.39 mm and 0.73 mm) and negative correlation with BA diameters (WA: -0.88 mm and -1.73 mm). Regression models including age, sex, TCV, and fPCA explained on average 15%, 13%, and 25% of the ICA, MCA, and BA diameter interindividual variation, respectively. Using height instead of TCV as a surrogate of head size decreased the R-squared by 3% on average. CONCLUSION: Brain arterial diameters correlated with age, sex, TCV, and fPCA. These factors should be considered when defining abnormal diameter cutoffs across populations.

BMI, insulin sensitivity, and cognition in early type 2 diabetes: The Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the association of BMI and insulin sensitivity with cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of data from the baseline assessment of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: a Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) was conducted. BMI was used as a surrogate of adiposity and the Matsuda index as the measure of insulin sensitivity. Cognitive tests included the Spanish English Verbal Learning Test, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and the letter and animal fluency tests. RESULTS: Cognitive assessments were completed by 5018 (99.4%) of 5047 participants aged 56.7 ± 10.0 years, of whom 36.4% were female. Higher BMI and lower insulin sensitivity were related to better performance on memory and verbal fluency tests. In models including BMI and insulin sensitivity simultaneously, only higher BMI was related to better cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, higher BMI and lower insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes were cross-sectionally associated with better cognitive performance. However, only higher BMI was related to cognitive performance when both BMI and insulin sensitivity were considered simultaneously. The causality and mechanisms for this association need to be determined in future studies.

Chromosome 10q24.32 Variants Associate with Brain Arterial Diameters in Diverse Populations: A Genome-Wide Association Study.

Background: Brain arterial diameters are novel imaging biomarkers of cerebrovascular disease, cognitive decline and dementia. Traditional vascular risk factors have been associated with brain arterial diameters but whether there may be genetic determinants of brain arterial diameters is unknown. Results: We studied 4150 participants from six geographically diverse population-based cohorts (40% European, 14% African, 22% Hispanic, 24% Asian ancestries). We measured brain arterial diameters for 13 segments and averaged them to obtain a global measure of brain arterial diameters as well as the posterior and anterior circulations. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) revealed 14 variants at one locus associated with global brain arterial diameter at genome-wide significance (P<5×10-8) (top SNP, rs7921574; ß =0.06, P=1.54×10-8). This locus mapped to an intron of CNNM2. A trans-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis identified two more loci at NT5C2 (rs10748839; P=2.54×10-8) and at AS3MT (rs10786721; P=4.97×10-8), associated with global brain arterial diameter. In addition, two SNPs co-localized with expression of CNNM2 (rs7897654, ß=0.12, P=6.17×10-7) and AL356608.1 (rs10786719, ß =-0.17, P=6.60×10-6) in brain tissue. For the posterior brain arterial diameter, two variants at one locus mapped to an intron of TCF25 were identified (top SNP, rs35994878; ß =0.11, P=2.94×10-8). For the anterior brain arterial diameter, one locus at ADAP1 was identified in trans-ancestry genome-wide association analysis (rs34217249; P=3.11×10-8). Conclusion: Our study reveals three novel risk loci (CNNM2, NT5C2 and AS3MT) associated with brain arterial diameters. Our finding may elucidate the mechanisms by which brain arterial diameters influence the risk of stroke and dementia.

The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia: Multidisciplinary and Open to All.

The brain changes of Alzheimer's disease and other degenerative dementias begin long before cognitive dysfunction develops, and in people with subtle cognitive complaints, clinicians often struggle to predict who will develop dementia. The public increasingly sees benefits to accessing dementia risk evidence (DRE) such as biomarkers, predictive algorithms, and genetic information, particularly as this information moves from research to demonstrated usefulness in guiding diagnosis and clinical management. For example, the knowledge that one has high levels of amyloid in the brain may lead one to seek amyloid reducing medications, plan for disability, or engage in health promoting behaviors to fight cognitive decline. Researchers often hesitate to share DRE data, either because they are insufficiently validated or reliable for use in individuals, or there are concerns about assuring responsible use and ensuring adequate understanding of potential problems when one's biomarker status is known. Concerns include warning people receiving DRE about situations in which they might be compelled to disclose their risk status potentially leading to discrimination or stigma. The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia (AGREEDementia) welcomes all concerned with how best to share and use DRE. Supporting understanding in clinicians, stakeholders, and people with or at risk for dementia and clearly delineating risks, benefits, and gaps in knowledge is vital. This brief overview describes elements that made this group effective as a model for other health conditions where there is interest in unfettered collaboration to discuss diagnostic uncertainty and the appropriate use and communication of health-related risk information.